Football Coach at PV

[R13]

[quote=joedirt;1851751]

Trying to figure out how old state titles translates to a new coach that didn't have anything to do with them, shoots him to the front of the pack? Pretty crazy logic.QUOTE]

Let me put it in simple terms: It's like when you are filling out a job application for head chef at a nice restaurant and you have 6 years at Mcdonald's as head burger flipper(Coeburn) or 2 years at the Gordon Ramsay in London (Powell Valley). Which do you think looks better? I know what most people would say, but if you think this is crazy logic then I might can make it a little more simple for you. Just let me know and I will do my best.

Since you worked real hard on this analogy, working at Ramsays place doesn't mean you know how to run anything or cook since he's no head chef, more like a janitor there. Just had to throw that in and plus we're not talking about running a program that was in their glory days, this isn't Phil we're talking about. Being part of team that USED to be good doesn't mean anything, now I'm not saying Coeburns coach is anything good, how good can you really be at coeburn anyway - blast me. I'm just saying let's not throw him up there with any head coaches when he's not one and running a team for a year or two doesn't prove much.

Just another reason I can't wait for consolidation, so the **** measuring contest is over with finally and the arguments over who has more titles years ago is so supreme. Then it'll slowly fade away at least with these 6, of course a new ****ing contest will take its place with the new schools but at least it will start over and it'll be a few decades before they talk about what happened and who was so great.

[Biggin]

that makes no sense 13.

his analogy is like this;

the job at Notre Dame is open.

Coach A has been a successful coach at Michigan
Coach B has been a successful coach at Miami of Ohio

Which coach is more likely to get the job?

[R13]

that makes no sense 13.

his analogy is like this;

the job at Notre Dame is open.

Coach A has been a successful coach at Michigan
Coach B has been a successful coach at Miami of Ohio

Which coach is more likely to get the job?

Ones a head coach and one isn't, it's not that clear cut.

But again, my comment wasn't talking up from Coeburn's coach, it was just a general statement about that logic that was being thrown about about him being a some shoe-in. I say Jimbo(who has had some health problems, don't even know if he'd jump on it) and BI(assuming he stays and this coming from someone who really doesn't like Kelly/Wise in general). Without a doubt.